Saturday, August 20, 2005

Black: Long legal battle expected

GILLIAN LIVINGSTON
CANADIAN PRESS
Source

Forever fallen from his perch high atop his former newspaper empire, Conrad Black's future seems destined to include endless — and expensive — legal wrangling if U.S. authorities lay charges and try to extradite him from his home in London, legal experts say.

With a prison sentence possible if he's convicted of securities fraud in the United States, the former Hollinger group chief executive will likely fight and delay extradition and any charges with all the clout and cash he can muster, lawyers said today.

Allegations two years ago that he fraudulently diverted cash from one of his companies led to a spectacular fall from grace for Black, a jetsetter who once gloated about the strength of his Hollinger newspaper empire, owned houses all over the world and regularly socialized with prime ministers and corporate kingpins.

But yesterday's blockbuster news in Chicago that Black's longtime crony David Radler has been indicted on securities fraud charges — and plans to plead guilty and co-operate with authorities — suggests Black could soon be next in the line of fire of U.S. law enforcement authories eager to crack down on corporate crime.

But U.S. authorities need to move quickly to lay charges against Black to get a potentially lengthy case started, said Douglas McNabb, senior principal at McNabb Associates, a Houston law firm specializing in international extradition.

"The U.S. cannot seek Mr. Black's extradition until after he has been charged," said McNabb, adding he's heard rumours that U.S. authorities could announce charges within a week.

Charges would lead authorities to request Black's extradition and to put a notice of the U.S. arrest warrant on Interpol, the international police network.

Even if charged and facing extradition, Black has several legal and appeal options that alone could drag out the extradition case for a few years at least, McNabb said.

"He's not a terrorist, he's a white collar guy, and he's got money and he's prepared to fight it," McNabb said from Houston.

Black, who gave up his Canadian citizenship a few years ago in a dispute with former prime minister Jean Chrétien over a British peerage, could face years of prison time, "absolutely, without doubt if he's convicted," McNabb said.

That gives Black a good reason to take each legal battle as far as he can.

There's little reason to see why Britain would prevent Black's extradition, McNabb said, since in 2003 the country changed its own extradition laws allowing the U.S. to extradite people as long as they could prove charges were pending.

U.S. authorities are playing out a now-familiar strategy. They will use information from Black's longtime associate, Radler — who was charged along with another executive yesterday with fraudulently diverting $32 million from Hollinger International — to build their case against the former media mogul.

"This is now a well-oiled routine of U.S. prosecutors to go after people close to the top of the organization . . . and then throw the book at them" to get them to help take down their former boss, said Joe D'Cruz, a professor at the University of Toronto's Rotman business school.

Authorities will use Radler's information to make their case against Black strong, particularly to lay out the motivation behind each transaction, said John Coffee, a law professor at Columbia University in New York.

"It's often very difficult to make the case simply from the paper record," he said. "That's why a witness is critical.

"(Radler) can implicate Black with having the requisite intent," Coffee added.

Radler's decision to co-operate is similar to what happened at failed telecom giant WorldCom Inc., where chief financial officer Scott Sullivan testified against CEO Bernard Ebbers in return for a lighter sentence of five years, said Michael Miller, a U.S. securities lawyer based in New York.

Ebbers was eventually sentenced to 25 years in prison.

If Black is charged, it will be up to him to decide whether he faces the charges head-on or uses all legal means to avoid them, Miller said.

Miller suggested that Black's lawyers and the U.S. Justice Department are in discussions about what he does next.

"I would assume there will continue to be discussions behind the scenes about whether Conrad Black, at the end of the day, has criminal culpability and whether it is advantageous for him to resolve that criminal culpability now rather than waiting for some day a year or two down the road," Miller said in an interview with ROBTv, a specialty business cable channel based in Toronto.

The last few years have been turmoil for Black, who has faced unending controversy over financial dealings at his companies that resulted in him being unceremoniously tossed as chief executive of the Hollinger Group.

"He was, in many ways, Lord of all he surveyed, and now of course he's under siege," D'Cruz remarked.

If Black is charged, the 61-year-old businessman's entire way of life will be altered, McNabb said. Travel restrictions will mean he can no longer follow his cosmopolitan way of life — in Florida one day, London the next, and he'll be faced with a long and expensive legal battle.

MDs back parallel private health care

JULIA NECHEFF
CANADIAN PRESS

EDMONTON—The Canadian Medical Association threw its support behind a parallel, private health-care system yesterday.

In what was a historic vote for the influential organization, delegates decided by a two-to-one margin that patients should be able to go outside the public health-care plan and use private insurance if they can't get necessary medical care quickly enough.

It's a major change for the association, which until now has been unequivocal in its support for a strong public system. The last time the CMA voted on such a motion was in 1996 when it reaffirmed its support.

But times have changed, said those who supported the motion during the public-private debate, which was supposed to end Tuesday but was carried over to yesterday — something that has never been done before at a CMA convention.

Supporters of the motion said too-long waiting lists are an urgent problem, the system is faltering and it needs help from the private sector.

"Governments have had 40 years to get the monopoly system right and the casualties are piling up — one of them has been my wife," said Dr. John Slater of Comox, B.C.

"I have stopped believing ... the government will ever fix the monopoly system."

President-elect Dr. Ruth Collins-Nakai disputed that the medical association is endorsing private health care.

The primary concern of physicians of Canada is that patients have timely access to quality care based on need, not ability to pay, said Collins-Nakai, a pediatric cardiologist in Edmonton.

Every resolution passed reflected the frustration of physicians not being able to provide timely access to care that they so want for their patients, she said.

"Delegates have said clearly that they believe the best solution is to provide that type of access is through a public health-care system," she added.

CANADIAN PRESS

Source

CMA Backs Alberta private medicare plan {Letter to the editor}

Harmful to back private health care


CMA backs parallel private health care

thestar.com, Aug. 17.I thought the motto of doctors was "do no harm." By throwing its weight behind private health care, the Canadian Medical Association is doing immeasurable harm to the majority of Canadians of average means who won't be able to buy their way to the front of the line or to afford private health insurance (even assuming they'll qualify for it).It takes a peculiar kind of "let-them-eat-cake" doublethink to characterize private health care as freedom of choice. The CMA simply can't reconcile its support for a private system with the principle that access to care should be based on need, not wealth — not unless, like the White Queen in Alice in Wonderland, they can believe six impossible things before breakfast.
Lydia Dotto, Peterborough, Ont.
Source